A Marked Decrease in Serum Cortisol
and Histamine Levels Using the Lumen Therapeutic Protocols for
Acute Low Back Pain
ByStan Gross, D.C., F.A.S.A.
Introduction: The Lumen Therapeutic Light System6
utilizes two specific light spectrum applications administered
with a carrier frequency with the clinical objective of reducing
pain and inflammation. While the initial clinical trials of this
device have proven to be effective in almost every trial case,
the underlying mechanism involving specific reactions has not
been identified or defined. This preliminary study was designed
to measure the subjective results via analog measurements using
the McGill Pain Management Survey1 for both pre-treatment and
post-treatment applications with patients suffering from acute
lumbar pain. Concurrently, saliva samples from all test subjects
were used to measure cortisol and histamine levels before treatment
and again thirty minutes following treatment. The intent was to
measure any physiological responses associated with pain and inflammation
using the two most accepted biological markers for these parameters.
Comparative data between the control group, the sham group as
compared to the primary subjects were collected over a period
of nine months. Since the sampling of data was relatively small,
the standard deviation of variables using p=dv/du7was applied
yielding a general predictability factor of +/- 4.0%. The objective
was to formulate a comparison between the observed results, the
measured results and the applied variables.
The Study Basis: 223 subjects were selected
over a nine month period. All of the subjects presented with acute
lumbar pain (an onset of less than three days that has not resolved
with rest or over-the-counter analgesics), sclerotogenous in nature
(no radiculopathy present or Somatovisceral symptoms which might
indicate pathologies outside of the standard lumbar spine presentations)
and no other traditional medical interventions including analgesics,
anti-inflammatory or other physiotherapeutic typically prescribed
for lumbar pain. All subjects were voluntarily included in the
study were given a brief explanation of the objectives. During
participation in the study, all subjects agreed to comply with
the guidelines and refrain from any additional therapies or medications
during the testing periods. 114 of the subjects were female between
the ages of twenty seven through fifty five with an average age
of thirty three. 109 of the subjects were male between the ages
of twenty three and fifty three with an average age of thirty
seven. All of thesubjects reported to be in excellent general
health with the exception of acute lumbar pain. 193 of the subjects
related the onset of pain with a specific activity while the remainder
had reported no specific incident but had suffered a previous
injury similar in nature. All of the subjects deny any previous
medical history which would implicate other underlying pathologies.
The study was broken down into three separate groups:
1. 72 were subjected to standard, conservative chiropractic management
for acute low back pain following the Mercy Guidelines for Lumbar
Pain Management.
2. 74 were subjected to the Lumen Therapeutic Light System using
the NICO Setting for the prescribed period following manufacturers
guideline.
3. 77 had the Lumen Therapeutic Light unit applied but it was
not activated.
Prior to the testing, each subject was asked to complete a McGill
Pain Survey, offering a subjective report of their symptoms. All
subjects submitted a saliva sample which was used to measure systemic
levels of cortisol and histamine using ELISA test kits4 . Each
subject was assigned a specific identifier within each of the
groups so that general results could be compared to the specific
groups to formulate an accurate predictor against the post-treatment
data. Thirty minutes following each treatment, the subjects were
asked to repeat the McGill Questionnaire and submitted a second
saliva sample for evaluation. The time delay following treatment
followed the ELISA guidelines for any accurate physiological changes
that might be measured in the post-treatment phase of the study.
The Results: Group 1, having been subjected
to conservative chiropractic treatment reported the following
results:
a. 57 out of the 72 subjects reported feeling less pain and more
freedom of motion with one treatment. On an analog scale of one
to ten (one being pain free and ten being extremely painful) all
57 subjects were able to drop their pain index from an average
of seven to an average three. The remaining subjects felt little
to no change in their pain or motion averaging a drop of only
one to two points on the pain index.
b. Normal salivary cortisol ranges for both men and women average
1.0 to 8.0 ng/ml5 during the waking hours. The average pre-treatment
results for all of the subjects in Group One were 14.9 ng/ml while
the average post-treatment totaled 6.2 ng/ml.
c. Normal salivary histamine levels for both men and women average
2.5 to 10.5 ng/ml during the waking hours. The average histamine
measurement for the subjects in Group One totaled 19.7 at pre-treatment.
The average post-treatment measurement totaled 7.5 ng/ml.
d. While nearly 72% of the subjects reported a marked reduction
in pain and an increase in motion, all of the test subjects demonstrated
a marked reduction in cortisol and histamine in the post-treatment
assessment.
Group Two was subjected to the Lumen Therapeutic Light Therapy
only and followed the same protocol as Group One. The following
results were recorded:
a. All 74 subjects reported a marked reduction in pain from an
average of eight on the index to a three. All of the subjects
reported feeling an increase in motion without painful restriction.
Of the 74 subjects, 12 reported a total remission of pain and
restriction while the remainder felt some residual pain and tenderness
in motion following treatment.
b. Pre-treatment cortisol levels averaged 14.2 ng/ml for Group
Two. Post-treatment levels averaged 5.2 ng/ml with the lowest
reading at 1.6 ng/ml.
c. Pre-treatment histamine levels for Group Two totaled 20.2 ng/ml.
Post-treatment levels totaled 5.7 ng/ml on average for Group Two.
Group Three did not receive treatment but had the unit applied
to the surface of the skin without activation. The patient was
in the prone position with no other therapeutic influences other
than mild lumbar extension in the prone position. The following
results were recorded:
a. Of the 77 subjects tested, 33 reported a marked reduction in
pain and an increase in motion. The average pain index was reduced
from an average of eight to an average of six with the lowest
recorded number of three by two of the subjects. The remaining
44 subjects reported feeling little to no change in their symptoms
or range of motion following treatment.
b. The average pre-treatment cortisol levels for Group Three totaled
22.3 ng/ml with the lowest at 10.6 ng/ml and the highest at 27.9
ng/ml. Post-treatment averages totaled 16.9 ng/ml with the lowest
reading at 8.7 ng/ml.
c. The average pre-treatment levels for histamine in Group Three
totaled 20.6 ng/ml. The average post-treatment histamine levels
totaled 17.9 ng/ml.
d. While the placebo effect remains an important factor in the
data, the closed-pack extension position during the study may
also have contributed to the reduction of pain and an increase
in range of motion.
Analysis: Group One demonstrated a subjective
reduction of symptoms of nearly 72%. There wasa 41.6% +/- 3% reduction
in cortisol levels and a 38.8% +/- 4% reduction in histamine levels.
All of participants in Group Two reported a marked reduction of
pain and an increase in range of motion. The average reduction
in cortisol totaled 36.7% +/- 3% and an average reduction in histamine
levels at 27.8% +/- 4%. Group Three reported a reduction in pain
and an increase in motion in 45% of the subjects. The average
reduction in cortisol levels was measured at 7.3% +/- 3% and an
average reduction of histamine at 8.6% +/- 4%.
Applying the statistical analysis of the McGill Pain Management
protocol, Group Two realized an effectual 93.7% reduction in symptoms
while Group One totaled 65.2% and Group Three only 19%. Using
the analog measurement records perceived levels of pain and dysfunction
based upon the subjective findings from the subject's symptoms.
The cortisol and histamine results suggest a physiological measurement
of pain and inflammation which does not necessarily correlate
directly with perceived levels of pain. Factors involving pain
tolerance, expected levels of recovery following treatment and
levels of pain at the onset contribute to the unmeasured variable
of the study.
Conjecture: Pain management research has advanced
the knowledge of mechanistic and physiological triggers involving
specific chemoreceptors that lie just beneath the skin surface.
Noceceptive or pain reactive responses are moderated and controlled
by opiate receptors and inflammatory response designed to prevent
further injury and stabilize the damage areas. Numerous papers
have been published regarding the use of specific analgesic chemicals
designed to trigger opiate responses and reduce inflammation by
facilitating various forms of analgesia either systemically, via
the central nervous system or applied to the site of injury. Recent
interest in alternative healing arts including acupuncture have
also yielded significant results involving the stimulation of
endorphins and the regulation of inflammatory reaction due to
injury. The use of cold laser or light therapy involving a wide
array of frequencies and band widths has drawn considerable attention
in recent research articles and the number of therapy units available
on the market is ever increasing. While all of the light therapy
units lay claim to some level of clinical success, the underlying
mechanism behind the data has remained illusive.
In order to trigger a response from the opiate receptors, chemoreceptors
and pain antagonists associated with analgesia, a specific stimulus
is needed to saturate the receptors. This study offers some evidence
that the Lumen Therapeutic Light System facilitates a reduction
in cortisol and histamine levels in subjects suffering from acute
lumbar spine injury. Following the principles of meridian therapy
and acupuncture9, the chemoreceptors just beneath the skin in
theparaspinal region are noted for the reduction in pain and inflammation.
Commonly referred to as the "Associated Bladder Meridian",
acupuncturists have used this region of the body to control pain
and inflammation associated with lumbar spine injuries through
the use of needles, moxabustion, shiatsu and various other forms
of Traditional Chinese Medicine with a high level of positive
clinical results. The results of this study strongly suggest the
same mechanism is triggered using the Lumen Therapeutic Light
system.
Conclusions: While the sampling for this study
is small with a very narrow focus group, the results strongly
suggest a mechanistic, cause and effect relationship between the
use of the Lumen Therapeutic Light system and a marked reduction
in pain and inflammation using pre-treat and post-treatment cortisol
and histamine levels as physiological markers. Using comparative
data of the control group to a sham and placebo model clearly
indicated both subjective and objective reduction in pain and
restriction. While these markers do not necessarily define the
underlying mechanism, the study clearly shows the physiological
response to pre-treatment and post-treatment applications. The
results of this study suggests the needed for a larger sampling
of acute pain subjects utilizing additional physiological markers
including interleukin 4 and 6, local and systemic endorphins and
serotonin levels. Comparative studies involving common analgesics
and anti-inflammatory medications could also offer interesting
results for both acute and chronic pain sufferers. Further investigation
is involving the treatment of various forms and causes for pain
is also strongly indicated.
(top)
References:
1. R. Melzack, MD, 2004, "On the Language of Pain", McGill
Pain Questionnaire: MajorProperties and Scoring Revisions, McGill
University, and Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
2. Mercy Guideline - Quality Assurance and Practice Alliance, Chiropractic Congress of State Associations, Revised, 1999. 3. Lumen Photon Therapy, Inc., Users Guidelines and Applications, photon light therapy unit NICO settings, 2004. 4. ELISA Test Kits, Neogen Biomedical Corporation, 620 Lesher Plaza, Lansing, MI 48912
5. Aardal E, Holm AC: "Cortisol in Saliva-Reference Ranges and
Relation to Cortisol in Serum", Eur. Journal of Clinical Biochemistry,
1995.
6. Lumen Photon Therapy, Models Lumen 90 and Lumen 264, Chesnee Road, Columbus,North Carolina, 28722
7. Jaeger T, Florian & Wasson, Tom, "Production to Specific
Complexities to VariableDeviation in Statistical Analysis",
CUNY Conference, Tuscon, AZ, 2005.
8. Camden, T, MD, "Normal Salivary Levels of Histamine and Clinical
Considerations," Neuroscience, Inc. 373 280th Street, Osceola,
WI, 54020
9. Lui Yanchi, Kathleen Vian, Peter Eckman, Fang Tingyu, "The
Essential Book ofTraditional Chinese Medicine," Shanghai University,
China, Revised 2002.
(top) |